Trial by Media

I was watching NDTV channel the other night & there was an interesting debate that was going on about the 'Role of the Media'. The specific reason for NDTV taking up that topic was that the Chief Justice of India, Mr. Y.K.Sabharwal had made the following comment in one of his speeches: "Judges are confused because the media has already given a verdict. I have asked judges to go by evidence before them". Why did he talk about this all of a sudden? The reason that I could perceive is the media's 'Interest' in the Jessica Lal case and it's involvement in the Priyadarshini Mattoo case.

Let me make this very clear here. I am a person who believes in the freedom of the press & also understand the great power it holds in a democratic society. But the 'Active' role that the media is playing in the 'Jessica Lal' murder trial is a case of the media losing its bearing & walking down an untrodden path of no return. Does the freedom of press entitle the media to label someone as 'Guilty' even before the judges of our court do? Does it entitle the media to 'Stop' the lawyer who is taking up the case for the defendant? (Incidentally, the lawyer happens to be none other than the mercurial Mr. Ram Jethmalani. Check out the interview & the transcript of the interview he gave to CNN-IBN here) I seriously don't think the media has those rights. Has the media forgotten the difference between the 'Accused' & the 'Guilty'? I would be really happy to support the media if it makes an honest effort in bringing up some solid evidence to prove that the accused is indeed guilty. Let it not resort to cheap tactics like 'Moral Black mailing' of the lawyer who has decided to appear for the defendant.

To sign off, I am just reminded of a beautiful line from the movie 'Spiderman'. "With great power comes great responsiblity". Let the media understand its power & its responsibilty.